So Many Books... - Debbie Harry Sings in French
Jun. 22nd, 2008
09:26 pm - Debbie Harry Sings in French
Honestly - I was somewhere between Georgiana and Darcy (that's eager and determined to be pleased respectively) on this one, in large part because of the typically thoughtful review on Seven Impossible Things Before Breakfast, which I read with interest. I'm certainly all in favour of any YA book which "introduces shades of gray into the black-and-white ideas of sexuality and gender", as the jacket-flap description of this book says it does. Seriously in favour. But then I read it... At first I thought the problems were merely the sort that could be overlooked as first novel narrative ones, such as the excessive number of issues packed into a too short book, and then I found myself saying 'Well, that could happen like that, if unlikely' -- and saying it again and again. I finished and was waiting to write it up until Wendy got a chance to finish and kept coming back to some of the potential problems I'd seen, and now am considerably on the far side of 'it's so well-intentioned that its technical flaws make it disappointing but no more'. Can you imagine how Georgiana would have felt had she been displeased with Elizabeth?
And now - finally! - comes the gender and sexuality greyness. Or supposedly so. When Johnny's mother decides she can't cope with him any more, she ships him off to his uncle (father's brother) in South Carolina. Good thing too, as his uncle Sam is instantly accepting, trusting, and an all-round good guy, in sharp contrast to the mother. (Or at least, as she is now.) More importantly, in the smalltown school, where Johnny is bullied and assumed by pretty much everyone to be gay (not unrelated, of course), he meets Maria. Maria's got issues of her own, as it later turns out, but she's super-cool, in a hot kind of way (haha, yeah, sorry) and most importantly, on a nearly miraculously serendipitous trip to a thrift shop she gets Johnny to answer the question of what he likes about Debbie Harry. He says "I dunno. I guess it's just the whole thing. The music. The band. I like the way they look. I like her style. She's tough, but she's really beautiful, too. I want --" He goes on to say that stupid as it sounds, he sometimes wants to be like that. On the way out, they happen to see a white dress which looks just like the one Debbie Harry wears on the cover of a Blondie album, and Maria buys it.
Next time he's over at her house she plays him Patti Smith and then gives him the dress. He's shocked and thinks she's making fun of him, but she says she did it so he could be tough and beautiful and she just thought it would be fun. And he eventually tries it on, seemingly more out of angry confusion than any independent desire to do so and then has a huge cathartic flood of tears about missing his father and his mother and loving Maria and feeling 'That I wanted to be somewhere else all the time, but I didn't know where or how to get there."
Maria then gets him to enter a drag competition as Debbie Harry, which he does because he wants to earn the prize money to give her, and he later tells his school counselor that it was 'fun', and then is asked if he wishes he were a girl. Here's his answer:
I had to think for a minute. Did I really want to be Debbie, or any woman? Did I want to be myself but with a different set of equipment? Was that the key? It seemed like a whole new set of problems."Nothing, John" is the right answer, of course, but I think Johnny asked the wrong question. More bullying happens, Maria's problems (her mother) come up and Johnny gets so badly injured by the bullies that his mother is called to come to the hospital. She plans to whisk him back to Florida because she thinks he's "turning into a gay" and he tells her he's not, but he thinks he's a transvestite. After a shock-horror reaction she suddenly says he can wear whatever he wants as long as she doesn't have to come to the E.R. to find him unconscious again, and lets him stay. (Picture me the kid in Strictly Ballroom looking in bemusement at her pal, saying "That was unexpected!")
"I like - I love women. They're beautiful and - they're just different. Sometimes I wish I could be gentle and beautiful and not be called a queer. But I don't hate myself or anything. I'm doing better, right? My grades are okay. I'm not getting into trouble. So what's wrong with putting on a dress every once in a while?"
Here's the kicker though - Johnny's Uncle Sam told him about how his dad used to be 'exotic' and how his mother 'made him' cut his hair, get a job, settle down - Sam had thought at the time that Johnny's mother wanted his dad to be something he wasn't. At the end, Sam gives Johnny a trunk full of his dad's clothes from his pre-married days - and it's not entirely clear whether he was just dressing in the glam rock style or whether he actually was transgender/cross-dressing too, but the implication is the latter.
So, after reading, I was quite disturbed about the lack of urgency Johnny has to cross-dress - although it would put him in a very small minority, he might not have experienced the desire to until he was 17 (or possibly one could say that the Goth eyeliner and lipstick satisfied the desire, but I think that's rubbish), but he's actually pushed into it by his girlfriend. This is -- well, I really don't think this is at all likely. And a drag show performance is a completely different thing again anyway. Plus there's his response to dressing en femme - when he's getting ready to go on stage a very nice Cher getting ready beside him looks in horror at the socks stuffed in his dress and provides a spare pair of falsies - he has no reaction to wearing them at all, except calling them 'frighteningly realistic' and then Maria walks in and gasps in admiration when she sees his cleavage. No - don't buy this as any kind of decent representation.
Then I got thinking a bit more about Maria. At first she seemed merely the 'perfect girlfriend': so understanding she knew what Johnny wanted even before he did. I actually had the phrase 'the girlfriend we all want' come into my head, before correcting (for myself, 'natch!) into 'the girlfriend we all want to be'. I didn't actually warm to her that much myself, but that can happen with 'perfect' characters. (Oh, she's not perfect really - she does get jealous and insecure when she finds Johnny dancing with a guy who's giving him a good old ass grab after the competition. But it's only briefly.) And then when I thought about how out of left-field the mother's sudden religious tract, damning behaviour seemed, combined with her even-more-sudden ability to accept his 'transvestitism', and combined that with the father's sadness and the sense that came through that he wasn't living life at all - and then he dies, of course - and it seemed that the book wasn't about Johnny, the supposedly transgender teen, but about women. Who can either be so super-extraordinarily insightful that they know what their menfolk need when the men don't have a freakin clue, or they can be the ones who don't understand, and so are soul- and life-destroying. (Though - thank heavens - there's a second chance if they have children, as they may, just may, learn a little something eventually.) And I know this isn't fair to the book, and I know if I hadn't jumped onto the 'that's how we women are supposed to be' bandwagon I wouldn't be so cross about it now, but I still hold that the book fails to some degree to do what it set out to do, which is portray a teen transgender boy.
I'm certainly not thinking there is one transgender experience, and if it isn't described here, the book fails on that account. All the same, had I read the book knowing little or nothing about the issue, and believing the book to be an informed depiction, then I would most likely have been seriously misled. And had I been reading as a teen who was transgender myself, I think I'd have been either incredibly frustrated that it didn't show anything of the very real need to express the 'other' (non-assigned) gender or left feeling even lonelier and weirder. (Sadly, given society's level of understanding and acceptance of transgender and transsexuals, chances are very good indeed that a teen *will* feel weird and lonely for at least some period of time.) Those are far more serious problems than the narrative flaws.
Here's Wendy's review. Would love to hear opinions - dissenting or otherwise - from other people who've read the book. Or interested people who haven't!

YEAH AND SO DO QUEERS.
(Sorry. The thing that's making me fume slightly over at Seven Impossible Things is all this Isn't it great that this character is [feminine but] NOT GAY! Isn't it awful that he's the target of homophobic bullying when he's NOT GAY!, and all I can hear is that he's only worthy of reading about because he's NOT GAY. Because we're all so, so bored with all these millions of gay characters in YA fiction, right? Sorry. I should go and rant at Seven Impossible Things, not you!)
This sounds to me like I will have the reaction I often have to texts and films that people call 'complex', ie that I will just go 'IT'S NOT COMPLEX, IT'S MUDDLED' (cf, of course and always, Harry Potter). Like, it stirs up lots of issues and then dodges out of coming to a conclusion about any of them and then turns that into a virtue by saying it's 'about the grey areas'.
In all fairness about the 7 Imp thing, I think most of that is because, whatever about the relative lack of gay characters in YA fiction, there's a complete and total lack of TG characters in YA fiction. A lot of people would know little to nothing about transgender and would feel that to understand that it's possible to be transgender and heterosexual (actually more common), would be to increase their understanding about a sizable group of the population, which would be a Good Thing. And I agree entirely, and think TG representation in YA is about where that of gay characters was - what - 20 years ago? But it's especially unfortunate for the one of maybe a(n Irish) couple of books to get it so badly off.
I *love* your pithy description of the muddled texts, which is just right. And as this book is pretty clearly well-intentioned, I really wonder why the author didn't do it from the POV of the girlfriend, which might have worked out much less muddled.
See, the thing that makes me weep with frustration is that gay representation in YA was better 20 years ago: Jenny Pausacker's What Are Ya?, a couple of M E Kerrs... Jean Ure did a bunch of nice gay characters in the 1980s before suddenly reverting to the 1960s template with the effeminate-foreign-suiciding-queer-boy plot of Get A Life!.
But yes, I completely sympathize with your/7B's point about absence of TG characters in YA (it's like a bi friend of mine says: better representation of bi people would be nice but for the moment I think we just needmore). It sounds also from 7B and your review that it's really unclear whether/that Johnny is transgender, and what that might mean (for him? for the author? for the reader?). Which puts it even more firmly onto my 'muddled' pile.
I'm not sure I agree that things were better 20 years ago. For one thing, there are finally starting to be books where gay is not The Issue. And it's not Tragic. They are flawed, but they exist. 20 years ago we had a lot more of I'll Get There, It Better Be Worth the Trip, in which the big exciting gay kiss is punished by the dog dying, or Annie on My Mind and Deliver Us from Evie (both of which I like a lot), in which coming out is tied to a major disaster outside of the relationship.
Now we have, oh, Boy Meets Boy, which takes place in its odd little fantasyland, and we are starting to have incidentally gay protagonists and secondary characters in YA fantasy. 20 years ago, outside of Mercedes Lackey, gay characters in fantasy were at best effeminate or dysfunctional, and at worst evil pedophiles (Anne McCaffrey, Orson Scott Card, Katherine Kurtz).
So I do think he gay representation in young adult fiction is getting a lot better than it used to be.
Right now I feel like representation of bisexuals is where representation of gay characters was 20 years ago. I'm getting really sick of seeing bisexual characters show up as villains in gay stories, where "bisexual" is actually code for "I was experimenting but now I am straight". We are starting to have a few good ones -- thank you, Brent Hartinger!
TG is up at, what, about 3 books by now? A few more? Luna (which is formulaic but totally adequate), Parrotfish (which I haven't read yet), Debbie Harry...
It's a tricky thing authors need to do, walking the line between saying "TG doesn't necessarily mean gay" and saying "thank goodness, because there is something wrong with gay". It's like watching Barak Obama deny being a Muslim, which would be funny if it didn't matter so much. Actually, it's exactly like watching Barak Obama deny being a Muslim.
Edited at 2008-06-23 01:06 pm (UTC)
I'm mostly just sulking because What Are Ya? (nineteen-eighty-fricking-five) does everything that contemporary novels are still being critiqued for not doing (but patted on the back for being 'better than it was twenty years ago...), but didn't spawn any followers and fell out of print. Ignore me.
*requests from ILL*
*feels victorious*
Oh, yes - that's perfect. And given that it is so tricky, I think people who aren't actually so much interested in 'the gender question' (see my reply to gair below) should probably avoid blundering around the subject, however good their intentions. (Here's the Ellegirl review. It's interesting, I think, how much focus Brothers seemed to have on ABTG (anything but the transgender).
(Fanfiction parallel: I am very insistent that Buffy's Willow Rosenberg is mistaken when she says "gay now", for a believe she is actually bisexual. So I want to write her in fanfiction as hooking up with men because I want to write against the norms that there are only straight and gay people. But because there is the norm that there are only straight and gay people, writing Willow hooked up with men isn't going to read as reinforcing her bisexuality, it's going to read as reinforcing her gayness as just a phase.)
By the same token, you want authors to write characters who are questioning gender or sexuality for which the questioning is notthe Issue, not the only point of the book. You want alternative genders and sexualities to be just another part of life. But if you can't do that in a way which respects all of those choices...
I don't know. It's hard.
Yeah, that's an interesting parallel.
It is hard, and I'm finding it very hard to say anything without adding tons of qualifications, which require further qualifications and on and on.
Hmm, I was just having a quick look at Parrotfish, and it looks a bit under-cooked too, possibly. But I've got Luna on my TBR list already. Have you actually read DHSiF? (If you have and think what I've said is all crap, don't worry about saying so!)
Yes, I think this is the real problem. If it were unclear because Johnny himself wasn't sure, then it would be fine, but it's not. It seems that his feelings and experience as described are very far from ones that would leave him in the place where he'd tell his mother he thinks he's a transvestite. (His word, not mine.) C. was just having a quick blog search and found a review on Elle Girl in with this: 'Brothers didn't want the story to be so much about the gender question as, “The way you naturally try on identities as a kid.”' Which would again be fine but *not* when you then present it as 'about the gender question' and use terms which have actual meanings other than 'trying on identities'.
That is very weird, especially as it's written in the first person! Considering that there are barely any children's/YA books at all out there on the subject, and that there are (though reliable numbers are hard to come by) probably millions of crossdressing teens and younger, it's a missed opportunity.